Agreed, one can find the needles, although you have the difficulty of that long probe, and some people claim that you can mess up the top of the filter or the sponge around the filter. I suspect that most refillers could manage to drill a good diagonal hole. You need to start with a pilot hole part way through the wall but straight in. In some cartridges you can see the divider wall (see HP picture below), so the target should be easy enough to find. Of course, I'm speculating. I haven't tried either way yet.ghwellsjr said:Yes, there is a reason: it will be very difficult to put a hole in the side at a steep enough angle to allow the needle to find its way to the hole in the bottom of the dividing wall. It's sometimes a challenge even with a two-inch needle going in straight from the far end of the cartridge. Two-inch needles are not that hard to find.
This shows it pretty clearly, on a Canon cartridge. If you look closely, you can also see some internal details from the outside of an HP cartridge.ghwellsjr said:I have never observed any grooves in a Canon cartridge that go all the way from top to bottom. Could you point out where you see these in one of the pictures?
It should be clear now.ghwellsjr said:The recessed grooves only go half way up the dividing wall in a Canon cartridge. So it ends just below the top of the lower sponge.
Good point. I hadn't thought of that. There's a way to avoid that problem, but there's a price.ghwellsjr said:You can easily overfill the sponges when top filling. It generally won't happen with the German (or as you say it, durchstich) method.
This is now explained further.ghwellsjr said:Also, I don't understand how you can determine how much ink is in a cartridge by drawing back on the syringe.
These questions are now answered above.ghwellsjr said:I presume you are talking here about refilling one of those HP cartridges that is disabled by virtue of the dividing wall being inserted up-side-down, correct? How would you refill from the top? It is quite easy to refill just the sponge side of a Canon (or HP) cartridge by dripping ink onto the outlet port (with the cartridge up-side-down of course) but it will not stop when the sponges are saturated--it will merely fill up the air gap in a Canon cartridge and eventually come out the air vent. I presume the same thing will happen for an HP cartridge.
No, apparently it isn't. I think the problem is controlling sponge saturation.ghwellsjr said:I would say it is nearly impossible to fill the reservoir from the outlet port, unless, of course, you introduce a hole in the reservoir or a needle in the reservoir.
Did you not understand jimbo123's post? It's not opaque. And even if it is, you can refill correctly. In my long post I describe how to determine the liquid level in an opaque cartridge.Parhs said:Am i going to have problems refiling these opaque cartridges? The text wasnt printed correctly. Printer needed print head alignment! Now prints ok!
Yes, probably. I think the sponge retards the ink flow a little. In a sense it acts like a crude pressure regulator.martin0reg said:Air from sponge chamber to ink chamber - and therefore ink from ink chamber to sponge chamber - is only flowing when the lower sponge gets DEsaturated to the upper end of the grooves.
A third party cartridge without grooves will give air and ink when the sponge gets DEsaturated down to the passage.
That's HP's fault. I even get some error messages with the non-refilled OEM cartridges. With refilled cartridges you probably need to turn the warning system off altogether, or it will pester you constantly. You can turn it off from the panel on the printer.barfl2 said:I had lots of printer messages telling me using used carts etc.
Thanks for the info. I had some trouble following the link you provided, and didn't realize what the #469 was.irvweiner said:ldallan: Here are the exit port caps that I use on my CLI8 cats, work very well. Check their #1916 plug for the refill port. Thr exit port caps let you store the carts side by side.
http://www.rjettek.com/catalog/product_ cts_id/469
Yes, there's a partial vacuum. Without the sponge, the vacuum would exactly counterbalance the difference in ink height between the two chambers. This must be true because the pressure in the sponge chamber is atmospheric. (Of course, the sponge complicates this a bit.)paulcroft said:...am I right in thinking that in use, and as the ink level drops, the air pressure above the ink will reduce to below atmospheric pressure?
Assuming the sponge chamber stays at atmospheric pressure, you can't get much ink out of the chamber unless you replace it with air. So I think most of the ink comes from the sponge at first, then once sufficient ink is drained from the sponge, air can get into the ink chamber. This is simplified a little because the sponge complicates everything.paulcroft said:If the pressure does drop as ink is used, how does the ink then flow from the ink chamber into the sponge chamber or is the reduction in pressure simply not enough to prevent this happening?