- Thread starter
- #11
Not on my iP4000 printers. They have 2 fiber pads that are easily removable.turbguy said:The "waste absorber sponge" that the print head rests on is really a thin, porous ceramic plate(s). . . .
Wayne
Not on my iP4000 printers. They have 2 fiber pads that are easily removable.turbguy said:The "waste absorber sponge" that the print head rests on is really a thin, porous ceramic plate(s). . . .
Wayne
Oh, Canon's are prone to purge unit issues, trust me! My i960 has not had clogging problems, but instead I have had internal vacuum tubing come loose from the nipples between the parking (purge) pad drain and the peristaltic vacuum pump (several times) and internal to the pump itself. The way Canon designed the i960's purge sytem, if you lose ONE connection, the whole vacuum capability of the i960's purge unit is lost. EVEN THOUGH THERE IS A DOUBLE PERISTALTIC PUMP!kpmartin said:I ran across an Epson printer that was nonoperational, and some web searching, followed by disassembly, revealed that the entire ink purge system was clogged with dried ink. I have it all cleaned out now but have not tested it yet (I am waiting for the dump sponge to dry out).
I would not be surprised to find that Canon printers were prone to the same problem.
My i960 is having problems lately, and I suspect the purge system is clogged. The above test show a relatively dry sponge in the cleaning station. So I may remove the case and see how the purge tubing looks.
-Kevin
Are your pads solid and inflexible, or flexible?ps.ijpf said:Not on my iP4000 printers. They have 2 fiber pads that are easily removable.turbguy said:The "waste absorber sponge" that the print head rests on is really a thin, porous ceramic plate(s). . . .
Wayne
http://www.nifty-stuff.com/forum/uploads/9330_img_2430_cropped.jpg