9 months ago this forum gave me usefull info for my Pixma 4600. I have now bought a 4850, but refill ink is giving similar problems to those that killed the 4600. Refilling the colour 521 cartridges was OK, but either the 520 cartridge or the black portion of the head seemed to clog up, reaching a point where washing could not get it going.
Discussion with local (Australian) ink suppliers has left me uncertain of the cause, & I am seeing early signs of the refill black ink causing problems - after printing 100 pages with a refilled 525 I had to wash the printhead to get all black nozzles printing. I then switched to an old 520 cartridge with original ink, which worked OK (seemingly suggesting the blockages were in the cartridge rather than the head).
The supplier suggests the continual wet & dry cycles are causing foam breakdown, which is clogging the jets. His black ink is dye-based, whereas the original Canon 520/525 ink is pigment based. I wonder if the foam in the 520/525 differs to that in the 521/526 cartridges, & is incompatible with dye-ink. If so, would taking the top off, replacing the foam with foam from old 521 cartridges (cut to shape) & gluing the top back on allow use of the dye-based ink? Alternately, I have found a supplier who states his ink is pigment based - would that be a better option to try. In all cases, is the cause incompatible ink, or incompatible foam, or might the inks be too coarse for the 4850 cartridges or printhead?
The supplier I have been talking to stated they supply dye-based ink for the 525 becuase it is lower viscosity that pigment based ones. I understand these are non-newtonian fluids, & I don't know whether the lower viscosity is at the relatively low shear rates used for standard laboratory viscosity tests, or the much higher shear rates as the fluid moves through the print head, ie I am uncrtain if this supplier understands non-Newtonian fluids.
So my problem is that I dont know why refilling the 520 or 525 is giving unsatisfactory results. Also, I dont have any way of assessing relative quality of the ink from various suppliers especially whether they have been filtered adequately. All suppliers claim their inks have been micro-filtered.
An alternative is to get a CISS system, but that more than doubles the printer cost, and is hard to justify for my modest amounts of printing.
Any suggestions on a way forward would be appreciated.
Discussion with local (Australian) ink suppliers has left me uncertain of the cause, & I am seeing early signs of the refill black ink causing problems - after printing 100 pages with a refilled 525 I had to wash the printhead to get all black nozzles printing. I then switched to an old 520 cartridge with original ink, which worked OK (seemingly suggesting the blockages were in the cartridge rather than the head).
The supplier suggests the continual wet & dry cycles are causing foam breakdown, which is clogging the jets. His black ink is dye-based, whereas the original Canon 520/525 ink is pigment based. I wonder if the foam in the 520/525 differs to that in the 521/526 cartridges, & is incompatible with dye-ink. If so, would taking the top off, replacing the foam with foam from old 521 cartridges (cut to shape) & gluing the top back on allow use of the dye-based ink? Alternately, I have found a supplier who states his ink is pigment based - would that be a better option to try. In all cases, is the cause incompatible ink, or incompatible foam, or might the inks be too coarse for the 4850 cartridges or printhead?
The supplier I have been talking to stated they supply dye-based ink for the 525 becuase it is lower viscosity that pigment based ones. I understand these are non-newtonian fluids, & I don't know whether the lower viscosity is at the relatively low shear rates used for standard laboratory viscosity tests, or the much higher shear rates as the fluid moves through the print head, ie I am uncrtain if this supplier understands non-Newtonian fluids.
So my problem is that I dont know why refilling the 520 or 525 is giving unsatisfactory results. Also, I dont have any way of assessing relative quality of the ink from various suppliers especially whether they have been filtered adequately. All suppliers claim their inks have been micro-filtered.
An alternative is to get a CISS system, but that more than doubles the printer cost, and is hard to justify for my modest amounts of printing.
Any suggestions on a way forward would be appreciated.