- Joined
- Oct 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,666
- Reaction score
- 1,349
- Points
- 337
- Location
- South Yorks, UK
- Printer Model
- Epson, Canon, HP... A "few"
Just had an ebay muppet decide to give me a dressing down for some perceived inaccuracy regarding my waste ink kits.
I'd post up the link, to the item he messaged me from, but I think my subtle advertising quota for this month might be used up If anyone is interested feel free to email me and I'll let you have the URL.
I've moderated the more colourful language but the grammar and spelling is pretty attrocious.
I'm guessing what he means is this:
Weird really because he never actually says what the heck he's so incensed about or gives any reference to where I've supposedly gone "wrong".
Anyhoo... gave this little response...
I'd post up the link, to the item he messaged me from, but I think my subtle advertising quota for this month might be used up If anyone is interested feel free to email me and I'll let you have the URL.
I've moderated the more colourful language but the grammar and spelling is pretty attrocious.
Nice eh?conspiracy theorist said:Hello
You are talking a losd of BULLS**T
the waste pads have nothink to
do with
((Parts inside the printer have reached the end of their service
life ))
the e prom on the board
clockes 1 when one prints
and the css
res setes that countes
not the waste pads
so what you saying is a load of
s**t
I'm guessing what he means is this:
*cue: much more helpful response from me *conspiracy theorist with improved manners and English skills said:Hello
I'm sorry but I believe you are incorrect in your description of waste ink in Epson printers.
My opinion is that the waste ink pads are unrelated to the problem. When you get the "Parts inside the printer have reached the end of their service life" message it's related to the EEPROM in the printer which stores the print count and it's this the the SSC utility resets, not the waste pads.
In short I feel you are incorrect and need to state this in your eBay listing
Weird really because he never actually says what the heck he's so incensed about or gives any reference to where I've supposedly gone "wrong".
Anyhoo... gave this little response...
Rather annoyed at this little scrote to be honest hence the somewhat restrained rant but damn if these idiots can't spell and/or write English properly. Anyone else had the joys of this sort of "constructive criticism" ??Me said:Erm. No...
What I'm saying is accurate and what you're saying (as
regards the technical details) is also true, except if I gave a full
technical account of what happens the end user would be asleep and/or
bored.
I haven't a clue which part of the description you disagree with
but here's a quick primer.
1. The printer uses the EEPROM to store
information on how many nozzle firings, cleaning routines and the time
period this has been completed
2. It uses this information and an
algorithm in the printer firmware to determine the worst case "full" point
for the printers pads. It has no detector in the pads to work out if they
really are full so it uses the programmed trigger point as the safety
net.
3. Eventually all printers will get the service required message
provided the printer is actually used enough to hit the magic trigger
point.
4. If the pads do get full and the end-user just resets them the
printer will flood so an external tank of some description is a must OR
they should get it serviced.
So, in a nutshell I don't see:
a) why the abuse
b) what's wrong with the information provided
If you have a
problem with the information and/or need clarification please feel free to
start over and make your point properly. Repeat the above however and
you'll just get ignored.