seems obvious to me there is a huge market for beating the chip,It's just a matter of cost management,it would cost alot of money to do and you would be opening yourself up to a lawsuit(even if canon has no case they will still cost you alot of money in litigation).I think the answer is to return these printers under the pretense that they did not divulge the fact you would need to buy only their ink.that will hurt their bottom line and thats the only way to make changes in the industry.websnail said:Just wanted to shove in my 10 penneth worth just to save you some effort or at least ask you to confirm or deny..philba said:I'm sure they do use encryption but given the size and cost of the chip, I doubt it's very heavy because the chip is probably not very powerful.
My sources indicated that a chip manufacturer took some time (considerable as it turned out) to work on the encryption on these chips and found that the encryption is multilayer... ie: 32bit, 64bit, 128, etc... with each layer being peeled back to show a greater level so they basically gave up in the end. Bearing in the mind that the source supplies a LOT of aftermarket cartridges and was looking to keep their canon market going they would have had to have a LOT of problems for them to give up.
Worth having a direct source to test and maybe beat it all though so just take it with a pinch of salt..
i would rather pay twice as much for the printer and get ink at a reasonable cost.