- Joined
- Sep 10, 2007
- Messages
- 1,562
- Reaction score
- 1,440
- Points
- 293
- Location
- Laramie, Wyoming
- Printer Model
- Canon i960, Canon i9900
I am convinced that Canon's drop-on-demand print head technology (thermal bubble jet) is more prone to wear and failure than Epson's piezo technology. Just reflect on what has to happen to eject a drop in a thermal print head. A large pulse of current has to be injected into a resistor (heater) in each nozzle to boil a portion on the ink. And this happens at repeatedly at an extremely high frequency. There are REALLY violent actions going on in each nozzle. Canon attempts to "protect" the head with temperature monitoring and cooling pauses during extended printing. But I believe they have not achieved optimum operation. I believe that Canon's marketing department pushes the engineering department to raise printing speed (ie, higher nozzle firing frequencies) in order to stay with the competition. And the printer only has to make it through a one year warranty period....RWL said:Based on some bad personal experience, I'm getting the impression that within the last 4 or 5 years Canon has designed their print heads to last a relatively short time, after which that failure disables the entire machine. Did I just have bad luck, or are you guys getting limited usage out of your Canons now too?
I forget the model of the previous Canon I had, but it used cartridges identical to the CLI-8's, but without the chip. It printed well for years, and when that one died, it didn't owe me a thing. A little less than 4 years ago, I bought an MP610 all in one because that was one of the last models still in production that used the resettable CLI-8 cartridges, and the next generation of printers used cartridges that held less ink, IIRC. My BCI-8 cartridges had been refilled 8 times when I got the message along the lines of 'Print Head Not Recognized' or "Wrong Print Head', after which the machine wouldn't power up. No green light; nada.
I can find similar stories on the web on a variety of different models of Canon printers. Are those of you who are heavy printers seeing the same thing, or did I just have bad luck? I was considering a used ip4500 but I'm leery of getting something whose life expectancy is limited. I'm getting the impression that the Epsons may be replacing Canons as the printer of choice for longevity and refilling although they use more ink - apparently because of their cleaning cycle.
That's why I slow down printing on my Canon's to the "quite" mode. Firing frequency is reduced.
Epson (piezo) print heads eject ink via a small crystal or ceramic structure that changes shape/volume and displaces ink out the nozzle opening. Very little current is used. Only VOLTAGE is applied to the crystal, and heating is much less of an issue (although there is still some "wear and tear" on a microscopic level).
Wayne