- Thread starter
- #11
That's essentially what I do...Xalky said:Wouldn't it be better to use an OEM cartridge and affix some hose barbs to the top of the cartridge?. That way you don't have to mess with moving the chips over to the new cartridges. I could also seal the vent in the OEM cartridge which would essentially make it airtight.
I've found this to be the case but that's using OEM cartridges rather than spongeless.. As Mikling pointed out with this more detailed post, there's a lot to the flow, reservoir, etc.. issueI can see that the reservoirs,and hose might be difficult to obtain, but you're telling me that a 4oz bulk ink bottle would work just as well.
Depends where you are but I'm guessing the USA in which case MIS do it... but if you're up for a trade I'd be happy to send you some hose and the fittings if you are happy to write up a "How to" for the 6700.Hoses? Where could I get the right hose?
It's not so much a vaccum as ink being used so it needs to replace it.. The ideal being that ink from the reservoir is drawn in and not air.. You also want to be sure you don't end up with a syphon effect (ie: free flow) but that's avoided by ensuring the ink level in a non-pressure balanced reservoir system never goes above the printhead level.It seems to me that you want the cartridge in the printer to pull a vacuum as the ink is used up so that it can pull ink from the reservoir. Is that correct? Along those lines, you want the reservoir to allow air intake at the top to replace the lost ink. Is that correct?
Pretty much.. With Epson cartridges and printheads it's easier because the design allows the equivalent of 2mm+ of cartridge rim to rubber contact all the way round, it does that by pushing the ink post up like a nipple into a rubber sealed hole in the cartridge. No seal problems at all...The system must be sealed starting from the printhead-cartridge seal all the way back to the reservoir output so as not to pull in air from the outside and to maintain a vacuum, or at least equal pressure such as would be found in a siphon system. Is that correct? Now, it's apparent to me why the seals at the printhead-cartridge is critical. Leakage there will cause all the ink in the cartridge to leak out as it gets replaced with air. It would also break the siphon between the reservoir and the cartridge.
I have an automotive manual vacuum pump . Can you post a link or picture of the plexi/jar setup. I'm real interested in that. Show me!! I like the idea of not punching holes. I'm not clear on the vacuum method of filling. Pictures would be great.mikling said:Now wouldn't it be easier to just gather a bunch of older cartridges that you already have, rig up a gang refill station and refill a bunch of the same color all at once at once ...boom boom boom. That's the KISS principle and it's proven. You might want to think about reviving your old printer with a new head.
Or even easier yet would be to get a vacuum pump, make a vacuum chamber and refill with that. you could get perfect refills each and every time just sealing the vent hole, standing your cartridge in a tray, apply vacuum, feed ink into tray and then release vacuum.... lift from try. The OEM seal remains, not one hole punched.
Total time 30 seconds to 1 minute.
vacuum chamber is easy to make.... one sheet of plexi 1/4" and up, inverted plastic or acrylic jar, home depot rubber roof flash for a sealing gasket. a few fittings and you're good to go. Vacuum pumps can be found for good prices on Ebay. I have two.
You might want to check the "prior art" - e.g.:mikling said:Now here's my patent and this is my public disclosure for refilling the chipped cartridges....