For occasional use, Canon is the logical choice. The basic ink delivery system that Epson uses is derived from industrial applications. Epson Piezo heads are more durable ( in the past) than thermal heads BUT they are well suited for continuous use. Thermal heads are much much better suited for occasional spotty use. They will clog less and waste a lot less ink than a piezo in these applications. Furthermore, if the user prints the occasional page, running out of ink will not be a problem with the Canon... a quick refill and they are running again. Once the Epson runs out of ink, the user might be in for some onerous chores of multiple head cleanings.
For light and occasional use, Canon is it, based purely on technical foundations and not fanaticism.
Reason for ( in the past) is that Piezo nozzle densities have increased as well as displacement capacity per nozzle. More nozzles in the same space being asked to do more. You will soon notice that printhead durability is not like the old days anymore. Similarly look for printhead delamination which was hardly heard of ten years ago. And at some point Epson has completely removed their once lifetime printhead guarantee which was there as late as 10 years ago. Thermal heads are on the upside these days, having better electronic deposition processes as compared to 10 years ago and better designs for durability and performance. I suspect that the lines are now intersecting between piezo and thermal but more importantly, the basic premise is occasional use and for that, Thermal heads are undisputed.
For light and occasional use, Canon is it, based purely on technical foundations and not fanaticism.
Reason for ( in the past) is that Piezo nozzle densities have increased as well as displacement capacity per nozzle. More nozzles in the same space being asked to do more. You will soon notice that printhead durability is not like the old days anymore. Similarly look for printhead delamination which was hardly heard of ten years ago. And at some point Epson has completely removed their once lifetime printhead guarantee which was there as late as 10 years ago. Thermal heads are on the upside these days, having better electronic deposition processes as compared to 10 years ago and better designs for durability and performance. I suspect that the lines are now intersecting between piezo and thermal but more importantly, the basic premise is occasional use and for that, Thermal heads are undisputed.
Last edited: