mavtop
Getting Fingers Dirty
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2021
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 30
- Printer Model
- Epson XP 15000
Hi all,
i got about 750+ sheets of A3+ old paper for 70 euros, it goes from Canvas, Fine Art, Glossy, Semigloss, Photo Quality, Matte, from Canson, Ilford, Epson, Canon, HP and other unknown brands.
For some of them i got the paper manufacter profiles for my Epson XP 15000 (but i think maybe i will do my custom the same) but for other i will have to do my own custom profiles.
I use ArgyllCMS software to create the profiles, i don't have any X-rite software, i bought the device with no disc/manual included.
Now i'm using this Print On Canson Extra Quality paper (i will attach a photo of the box) and i tried to print two small 100x150mm (A6) charts with 180 patches (Black=4 White=4 Grey=59) using Epson Photo Quality media type (printed with Quality only it was possible) and Epson Matte media type (printed with High Quality), no color management from printer, using Adobe Color Print Utility software.
I tried this two media types because on the box there is nothing about which media type setting to use and i printed the standard images (i attached them) and i see more B/W details and contrast on the Matte image (notes added).
I didn't try to print using Epson Glossy or Semigloss Paper media types ? Do you think i would try them too (i have about 150 sheets of A3 so it is not a problem to use some A5/A6 sheet) ?
I used BN spacers for my i1pro devices (is it better to use BN spacers or COLORED spacers with the i1pro ?) but while for the charts with Epson Matte i read the patches without any problem, for the chart with Epson Photo Quality i had an hard work to read all the strips.
Also the profcheck for the Matte (only 1 reading) gives: errors(CIEDE2000): max. = 1.036895, avg. = 0.225911, RMS = 0.273122
While the profcheck for the PhotoQuality (i had to make 3/5 readings for 3/5 strips) gives: errors(CIEDE2000): max. = 2.860489, avg. = 0.530873, RMS = 0.763451
While both the max/avg/RMS values are low enough, the Matte would have better values.
I compared ICC profiles with iccview.de and it seems that the Photo Quality profile has a wider gamut (just a little not on all colors) while the Matte has a better black (that confirm my initial notes), if someone can give me some suggestions on which one is better to use, i will redo the full profile with the best of two profile or if you think i would try also Glossy and Semigloss i will redo two A6 print with the same chart and new comparing.
Thanks for any suggestion
i got about 750+ sheets of A3+ old paper for 70 euros, it goes from Canvas, Fine Art, Glossy, Semigloss, Photo Quality, Matte, from Canson, Ilford, Epson, Canon, HP and other unknown brands.
For some of them i got the paper manufacter profiles for my Epson XP 15000 (but i think maybe i will do my custom the same) but for other i will have to do my own custom profiles.
I use ArgyllCMS software to create the profiles, i don't have any X-rite software, i bought the device with no disc/manual included.
Now i'm using this Print On Canson Extra Quality paper (i will attach a photo of the box) and i tried to print two small 100x150mm (A6) charts with 180 patches (Black=4 White=4 Grey=59) using Epson Photo Quality media type (printed with Quality only it was possible) and Epson Matte media type (printed with High Quality), no color management from printer, using Adobe Color Print Utility software.
I tried this two media types because on the box there is nothing about which media type setting to use and i printed the standard images (i attached them) and i see more B/W details and contrast on the Matte image (notes added).
I didn't try to print using Epson Glossy or Semigloss Paper media types ? Do you think i would try them too (i have about 150 sheets of A3 so it is not a problem to use some A5/A6 sheet) ?
I used BN spacers for my i1pro devices (is it better to use BN spacers or COLORED spacers with the i1pro ?) but while for the charts with Epson Matte i read the patches without any problem, for the chart with Epson Photo Quality i had an hard work to read all the strips.
Also the profcheck for the Matte (only 1 reading) gives: errors(CIEDE2000): max. = 1.036895, avg. = 0.225911, RMS = 0.273122
While the profcheck for the PhotoQuality (i had to make 3/5 readings for 3/5 strips) gives: errors(CIEDE2000): max. = 2.860489, avg. = 0.530873, RMS = 0.763451
While both the max/avg/RMS values are low enough, the Matte would have better values.
I compared ICC profiles with iccview.de and it seems that the Photo Quality profile has a wider gamut (just a little not on all colors) while the Matte has a better black (that confirm my initial notes), if someone can give me some suggestions on which one is better to use, i will redo the full profile with the best of two profile or if you think i would try also Glossy and Semigloss i will redo two A6 print with the same chart and new comparing.
Thanks for any suggestion
Attachments
-
foto_scatola_print_on_canson_extra_quality_paper_130gsm.jpg48.9 KB · Views: 107
-
2023-10-30 MT matte left - MT photo quality right.jpg288.9 KB · Views: 109
-
2023-10-30 print info.jpg200.9 KB · Views: 108
-
my 180 120x150 20231111-1319 on A6.jpg73.2 KB · Views: 107
-
A6 icc profiles.zip1.8 MB · Views: 148
Last edited: