- Thread starter
- #21
easytimes
Getting Fingers Dirty
I had HP printers from 1995 to about 2003, and now have nothing but Canon for daily work. For me, the difference in functionality and stress on my computers was dramatically different. Any HP printer I had with card readers required the readers to be disabled, so as not to hang up any search functions. Printing was nice with HP, but ink was expensive... that issue may have changed, by now.stratman said:Don't forget about HP disk printing. Additionally, you can get CISS systems which work with the printers (supposedly).The Hat said:Now back to the dreaded US Canon / Epson disc printing battle, the plot thickens ..
I have read some reviews by people who have had Canon disk printers and tried the HP versions... and they seem to think HP handles disk printing as if it were an occasionally performed novelty. Like I said... the lack of disk printing is a deal breaker for me.
I wonder how Epson could have bamboozled Canon into disabling their disk printing, but didn't hook HP on that issue? That license excuse never has made sense to me. I asked Canon, as far as I could reach by email, and they never mentioned anything about licensing.
As far as Epson goes... reviews of their products, throughout the product line, appear to reflect a part time printer building operation. Their printers seem not to be able to recognize their own new cartridges... paper jams have been a recurring problem, from all I read, and aside from excellent photo printing capabilities, there isn't much to distinguish them from the other two of the "big 3 print guys".
Breaks my heart to say this, because I have an Epson Perfection 4490 Photo scanner that I really like, now that I have moved away from Win2k operating systems. I would constantly have to do a uninstall of the Epsonscan program, and then scour the registry to allow a clean reinstall... since XP and now Win7... my scanning has been golden.
Oh yes... in JVC/TY disk area... I used the valueline for a while... but that only gave me about 5% coaster burning, and for my situation, that's unacceptable... I compromised by using the 8x premium line... makes for a nice price, and I can count the coasters on one hand for a year. The speed difference between it and 16x isn't enough to justify the extra expense... my Samsung burners on fresh builds with Win7 (Ult/Pro) OSs burn those 8x disks at 12x speed, if the burn monitor can be believed. When the the 16x disks hit 29-32 cents a disk, I'll make the change to speed burning. While they hang near 40 cents/disk... I'll wait the few minutes it takes to burn a full DVD 5.
CISS???, is anyone here doing anything with cont. ink, or is that just a legend? I don't know if I need to go that far, but I'd like to know more about it. I'm so crowded, right now, I don't know if I could squeeze out more space for the multi-disk print setup, I have seen... but I am not above a complete redesign of my little 10x12 computer room, to get a good result. It looks like a hi-tech rat's nest, right now.