crenedecotret
Print Addict
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2006
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction score
- 62
- Points
- 163
Thanks! I fixed it and changed the attachment in my Spyder 225+grays post
Last edited:
The TC9.18 is a bit old but i'm curious to see if it will give good or similar results compared to just letting Argyllcms determine the patches.With some manipulation and the dedicated work of @crenedecotret I managed to manipulate the famous TC9.18 target (from X-Rite i1Profiler) and which is indeed considered as the gold standard target for RGB printer targets to be compatible with ArgyllCMS and the i1Pro2 spectro + scanning table.
The patches are randomized before I made this manipulated target so you will have a better ergomical scanning experience by aligning the target towards the right border of the scanning table: the i1Pro2 scanning eye will stop exactly on the white area at the end of the row and before the corresponding letter of the row you are scanning.
The TC9.18 is a bit old but i'm curious to see if it will give good or similar results compared to just letting Argyllcms determine the patches.
I noticed that the TC918 doesn't seem to include much in the way of neutral. At least not at a quick glance. I built another three page target (enlarged i1 size) that combines the TC918 and Spyderprint grays. If you modify it, the last 167 patches in the ti1 are just there to fill my third sheet