- Thread starter
- #21
palombian
Printer Master
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 1,907
- Reaction score
- 2,290
- Points
- 297
- Location
- Belgium
- Printer Model
- PRO10,PRO9500II,MB5150,MG8250
I've spent some time to evaluate the impact of the switch to inks available in Europe (in casu octoinkjet.co.uk) and the eventual switch from PRO 9500II to PRO-10.
I will compare profiles for the Ilford Smooth Gloss paper found on the Ilford site and OctoInkjet with the ones I made myself on this paper with a ColorMunki Photo with i1Studio software.
My actual inkset is the new Precision Colors formulation for 9500.
First the impact of changing the (STS) yellow C7062P by (octo)LXP72Y (last one in plain):
I loose a bit yellow, although there is some dilution from the cartridge flush.
Anyway the C7062P is still available at octo.
This is a very strong yellow as can be seen compared to 9500 OEM ink (in grey):
This shows the PC inkset is not bad at all.
Same situation (my actual inkset in plain) versus a PRO-10 with the octoInkjet V2 inkset:
I win in orange but loose a bit green and purple.
The yellow is at the same level (confirming my doubt about dilution ?).
At last my 9500 with PC ink versus a PRO-10 with OEM ink:
Again, as with the 9500 OEM, there is some loss with 3th party ink (costs €123.50/l versus 821,50 for OEM).
IMO the PRO 9500(II) is not far behind the PRO-10 and I see no urgent reason to replace it.
I can live with the gloss differences, my daily paper ALDI glossy 300g (€5.99 for 50 A4, sadly enough no A3) has exactly the same color width as the Ilford Smooth Gloss tested above.
As good as the Precision Colors PRO-10 inkset can be, I can't buy it.
OctoInkjet.co.uk's suggestion to replace most of the 9500 inks by the PRO-10 version (except R,M and PM where they have a separate V2 ink) seems reasonable and the day my last 9500 breaks I can continue to use the inks.
I will compare profiles for the Ilford Smooth Gloss paper found on the Ilford site and OctoInkjet with the ones I made myself on this paper with a ColorMunki Photo with i1Studio software.
My actual inkset is the new Precision Colors formulation for 9500.
First the impact of changing the (STS) yellow C7062P by (octo)LXP72Y (last one in plain):
I loose a bit yellow, although there is some dilution from the cartridge flush.
Anyway the C7062P is still available at octo.
This is a very strong yellow as can be seen compared to 9500 OEM ink (in grey):
This shows the PC inkset is not bad at all.
Same situation (my actual inkset in plain) versus a PRO-10 with the octoInkjet V2 inkset:
I win in orange but loose a bit green and purple.
The yellow is at the same level (confirming my doubt about dilution ?).
At last my 9500 with PC ink versus a PRO-10 with OEM ink:
Again, as with the 9500 OEM, there is some loss with 3th party ink (costs €123.50/l versus 821,50 for OEM).
IMO the PRO 9500(II) is not far behind the PRO-10 and I see no urgent reason to replace it.
I can live with the gloss differences, my daily paper ALDI glossy 300g (€5.99 for 50 A4, sadly enough no A3) has exactly the same color width as the Ilford Smooth Gloss tested above.
As good as the Precision Colors PRO-10 inkset can be, I can't buy it.
OctoInkjet.co.uk's suggestion to replace most of the 9500 inks by the PRO-10 version (except R,M and PM where they have a separate V2 ink) seems reasonable and the day my last 9500 breaks I can continue to use the inks.
Last edited: