Artur5
Printer Master
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 1,306
- Reaction score
- 1,635
- Points
- 278
- Location
- Kmt. 0.
- Printer Model
- MB5150,Pro10s,i3Mk3s+,Voron2.4
The nozzle test posted by @Lia looks absolutely normal to me. On the tests of my Pro10s, magenta and photomagenta densities are practically the same too. Magenta a little bit darker but the difference is very subtle, you have to look carefully to see it. Quite different from the image from Canon’s web. Likewise, cyan and photocyan are almost impossible to tell apart.
I’m using inksets from Octoink now, but my first nozzle checks with Canon OEM ink were the same in that aspect.
That printer gradient is another story, of course. Ink starvation seems a far fetched explanation. For one thing, PGI-72 carts are spongeless and the chances that the felt pad of the output became clogged enough to prevent normal inkflow seem very low. Nevertheless, during the years dealing with inkjet machines, I’ve learned that with these weird creatures nothing is impossible unless proven so and even in this case I wouldn’t bet on it.
I’m using inksets from Octoink now, but my first nozzle checks with Canon OEM ink were the same in that aspect.
That printer gradient is another story, of course. Ink starvation seems a far fetched explanation. For one thing, PGI-72 carts are spongeless and the chances that the felt pad of the output became clogged enough to prevent normal inkflow seem very low. Nevertheless, during the years dealing with inkjet machines, I’ve learned that with these weird creatures nothing is impossible unless proven so and even in this case I wouldn’t bet on it.