- Thread starter
- #11
Smile
Printer Master
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2006
- Messages
- 1,914
- Reaction score
- 418
- Points
- 253
- Location
- Europe EU
- Printer Model
- Canon, Brother, HP, Ricoh etc.
The dust/scratch removal with either FARE3 or ICE uses a second INFRARED scan after the white-light scan (with an infrared light source in the scanner LID) to detect the defects.
The IR scan is in both AFAIK the LID and the Bottom.
So why then it is advertised that FARE3 Removes dust from PRINTS?
Wasn't 9000F mark I advertised that it can remove defects from prints too? AFAIK it was. So why you say it would not work at all? Have you got any samples to show how good/bad it actually works, I read medium or high setting should be used.
There is a review that shows ICE on V700 on photos, it works, but since the images so small I can't understand how good/bad.Since you wish to remove defects from non-transparent (reflective) materials (photos and prints), neither scanner would work for dust/scratch removal in your application.
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson V700/page_5.htm
BTW, since infrared will not penetrate silver deposits, B&W silver negative films cannot be scanned with either FARE3 or ICE dust/scratch removal. Only dye-based transparencies (E6 process) or color-negative films work.
Yes I know this, and I need this only for PRINTS, not transparency.