- Thread starter
- #51
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 15,792
- Reaction score
- 8,824
- Points
- 453
- Location
- Residing in Wicklow Ireland
- Printer Model
- Canon/3D, CR-10, CR-10S, KP-3
I wish you'd shut up about us idiots wasting all our GO that we've bought from you.mikling said:Joe, I had suggested using a "negative" of the image in grayscale to vary the depth of gloss applied.
Digital has been with us so long, I bet some folks have not seen a B&W "negative"!
Seriously dough if the photo turns out that great then its worth every penny and if its not quite right, sure we can always put it back through for a second coating now thats wasting it.
As I said I only tested using the plain paper setting and no other, I got such a surprise when it worked so beautifully the first time that I forgot to try any other settings, I was stuck for words it was so simple. (Shocked).mikling said:Ok, Hat, I got lost along the way.
So as long as you print using the media type as plain paper, it always uses only the MK setting. Is this right?
I can see this idea has a lot more in it than I ever imagined and it will evolve more and more as time goes on, I reckon there are far more ways to use this GO to be discovered as yet,I am even thinking of testing it on dye ink to see if it can reduce long term fading..