So when was the last time anyone thought of this. We use ball point pens to sign legal documents that are supposed to be legally binding for a very long time and we never think twice about the ink in the pens. This can be for baptism papers, wedding documents, bank accounts etc. land titles
Well as it turns out the ball point pens I have been using fade away faster than aftermarket dye ink. I labelled some prints using a ball point pen and after a month of exposure, the prints are still going strong but the markings I used with the ball point pen has completely disappeared. I have to resort to imprints to determine the samples. How many banks test for archival ink in their pens? The fact that their docs are now scanned and stored digitally gets them a pass however.
So with all the hallabaloo about archival issues, I bet there are so many more important thinks that truly require archival inks and no one gives that a second thought.
I'm now also starting to wonder about fountain pen inks as well.
Well as it turns out the ball point pens I have been using fade away faster than aftermarket dye ink. I labelled some prints using a ball point pen and after a month of exposure, the prints are still going strong but the markings I used with the ball point pen has completely disappeared. I have to resort to imprints to determine the samples. How many banks test for archival ink in their pens? The fact that their docs are now scanned and stored digitally gets them a pass however.
So with all the hallabaloo about archival issues, I bet there are so many more important thinks that truly require archival inks and no one gives that a second thought.
I'm now also starting to wonder about fountain pen inks as well.