- Thread starter
- #141
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,675
- Reaction score
- 1,309
- Points
- 277
- Location
- UK
- Printer Model
- Canon Pro9000 II
@pharmacist
Here are the results of my tests:
The 480 proved very easy and quick to read. I printed the .tif on my Pro9000 II, with a new printhead (the old one finally gave up the ghost) and 8 IS inks (Pro Platinum on Sihl).
I have attached some Gamutvision screens, which show excellent results, no dog leg in the B&W density and good linearity. Generous, smooth colour gamut and good simulated colour checker.
![Pharmacists 480 - Delta E Simulated Colorchecker.png Pharmacists 480 - Delta E Simulated Colorchecker.png](https://www.printerknowledge.com/data/attachments/1/1191-07a2c0e94ab6fbbf1ddbd1b6d9c18f81.jpg)
Here are the results of my tests:
The 480 proved very easy and quick to read. I printed the .tif on my Pro9000 II, with a new printhead (the old one finally gave up the ghost) and 8 IS inks (Pro Platinum on Sihl).
I have attached some Gamutvision screens, which show excellent results, no dog leg in the B&W density and good linearity. Generous, smooth colour gamut and good simulated colour checker.
![Pharmacists 480 - B&W Density.png Pharmacists 480 - B&W Density.png](https://www.printerknowledge.com/data/attachments/1/1190-f127aab28c3a020abf5fbe39e01a04ef.jpg)
![Pharmacists 480 - Adobe RGB 1998.png Pharmacists 480 - Adobe RGB 1998.png](https://www.printerknowledge.com/data/attachments/1/1189-99a12b93cb2f4228e136e318c394f566.jpg)
![Pharmacists 480 - Delta E Simulated Colorchecker.png Pharmacists 480 - Delta E Simulated Colorchecker.png](https://www.printerknowledge.com/data/attachments/1/1191-07a2c0e94ab6fbbf1ddbd1b6d9c18f81.jpg)