I agree I returned the spyderprint I had very weird colours on the standard test images. if you are interested I could post a profile from spyderprint and ColorMunki with argycms
Could you elaborate more on this point I don’t really understand. I tried to look at the documentation but I could not figure it out.
If I want to get the best perspective what source profile I should use? Most of the examples that I have seen uses adobeRGB. For example what would be the best...
I can do test I have the Color munki with both argycms and i1 studio on my mac.
EDIT: In attachment you will find a profile done with colormuki with Xrite and with ArgyCMS
those are OEM carts refilled by Octoinkjet and i have the same problem canon OEM. It does that for all papers so I dont think is paper curling but i can try to clean up the system.
could it be a problem with the print head gaskets not sealed properly?
Hi Guys, quick question,
When I print with my pro 10, it leaves a lot of ink on the side like in the photo. The nozzle check is ok, I also tried to clean the printer head resting pad. but still the same thing.
This is the same for Octoink cartridges and Canon brand-new OEM cartridges.
The...
Hi all,
I will now start to refill my PGI-72 with OctoInks. When I got the printer I had Cartridges that were mounted to the printer head. The printer wasn't used for 5y. So those cartigdes contain dried ink. I was wondering If I could clean them with Alcohol Isopropyl and distilled water...
In some video that I saw on youtube long time ago If I rememeber correctly the guy explained that you need to enable BPC only when you have colors that can not be reproduced. For exampl if your paper/ink can produce a maximum of RGB value of =8,8,8 than your image the darkest point is 10,10,10...
An update to this Topic, I have found that the Canon pro 10, on A3+ sheet give much more details compare to the ET8550 on Fotospeed Platinium Etching Paper (Fine Art Paper).
Color accuracy is also much better on a Standard Image (test images from Jtoolman).
Therefore I decided to buy Octoinks...
Tu be honest profites from the manufacturer a good one like Hahnemuhle will probably better than the profiles created with argy for the perspective rendering intent. I all not ultra convinced about the profiles from argy compared the one made by manufacturers. It comme useful if you have a...
I don't know if there is much more changes between the PP201 and the PT101 with the ET8550. The Original ICCs for the canon pro 10, there is a very small difference between PP201 and PT101.
The PT101 paper has a bigger gamut
It works with 812, you need colored separators, crop a bit the image to have perfect use of the paper, and move rather slow. But that does not give you more benefit than the 600 patch target which is much easier to scan(like 5min vs 15min), even the 483 is very good compared to OEM profiles...
I did another test today, comparing my standard 483 patches vs 812 patches with some profiles as reference:
483 Command:
targen -v -d2 -G -e6 -B5 -g128 -f483 "test"
812 Command:
targen -v -d2 -G -e6 -B5 -g64 -s16 -f812 -c SOME_GLOSSY_PROFILE_FROM_MY_PRINTER "test
Both tests were tested on the...
New test result: Canon Glossy Plus II (PP201) paper
So I have to say first that the Profiles that I get from the Color Munki with 483 patches (812 patches don't change much on a different paper) are a perfect match to the Canon Profiles. Really appreciate that! It is not like profiles from the...
Did you use "spotread.exe" to mensurate the values of the patches? I would say mesures are within margin error...
0.55mm aperture is quite small! but it looks like there is not too much impact.
I tried an 812 patch vs the CAP480 (addressed in this thread). I see a very tiny improvement of the...