pharmacist's latest activity
-
pharmacist replied to the thread ArgyllCMS and X-Rite i1Pro2 target sets.The sixth set is for 13x18 cm photo cards (5x7") with 702 patches to be printed on 3 sheets of 13x18 cm photo cards -
pharmacist replied to the thread ArgyllCMS and X-Rite i1Pro2 target sets.The fifth set is a a more advanced target set containing 1600 patches to be printed on 2 sheets of A4 and has 256 grey steps and takes...
-
pharmacist replied to the thread ArgyllCMS and X-Rite i1Pro2 target sets.The fourth set is for profiling printable PVC cards that can be inserted in dedicated PVC ID card trays available for several Canon and...
-
pharmacist replied to the thread ArgyllCMS and X-Rite i1Pro2 target sets.The third set is a smaller A4 patch set that has 648 patches based on RGB: 8x8x8= 512 patches for the RGB colour space + 128 grey steps...
-
pharmacist replied to the thread ArgyllCMS and X-Rite i1Pro2 target sets.The second set is for the smaller 10 x 15 photo card (4x6"). This patch set contains 504 patches and must be printed on 4 photo cards.
-
pharmacist posted the thread ArgyllCMS and X-Rite i1Pro2 target sets in Printing Photos and Photo Software.In the past years I have made several target sets for the X-Rite i1Pro2 device using ArgyllCMS to create printer profiles. I want to...
-
pharmacist replied to the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ?.The Colormunki/i1Studio is actually a very good device....only crippled by the software. However despite that the iterative 2 step (2x50...
-
pharmacist reacted to thebestcpu's post in the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ? with
Like.
Thank you for sharing the results of your experiments. It was excellent (and surprising) how closely the two profiles from two different... -
pharmacist replied to the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ?.Anyhow, despite the strange, but very good black level on the P900 without a noticeable difference between BEO or not BEO, the...
-
pharmacist reacted to Ink stained Fingers's post in the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ? with Like.
The dye-pig comparison target reports a black level for the dye print of L= 4.3 1.06 -7.31, that's a very good black level as well, not...
-
pharmacist replied to the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ?.Here is the ET-8550 profile using the same target and i1Pro2.....definitely a higher black level. i1Pro2 is not defective.
-
pharmacist replied to the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ?.I am using photoshop using native Epson P900 driver to control (disabling) color management. I will first try the ET-8550 target and see...
-
pharmacist replied to the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ?.For sake of comparison I will print the same target on my Epson ET-8550 (no black enhance overcoat whatsoever) and will generate a new...
-
pharmacist replied to the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ?.The gloss does not look different at all: I looked especially on the black patches and the same gloss. This really intriges me :)
-
pharmacist replied to the thread Same target: scanned by both Colormunki and i1Pro2, differences in profile quality ?.Today I reprinted the target and double check if the Black Enhance Overcoat has been unchecked and I rescanned the profile with the...