But the main thing is, regardless of the paper and printer settings, the high dmax with i1studio, and the unusable rendering of the dark tones in the relative intent with Argyll...
The luminance diagram from the Xrite Profile with the relative intent shows a Dmax that is "correct", about 2,1. So does the diagram "without" intent, which is also linear. So I think Argyll "messes up" the luminance curve of the relative intent, with this ugly "Dog foot"...
This is why I ask If...
I chose preceptual with the X-Rite profile because it is recommended...
Colorimetric (is this relative?) with the other two, because this is what I always did with printing. The online-service profiles were usually very good with this intent.
Used colormunki for Argyll and X-Rite, Argyll with...
Hi,
made a few profiles with i1Studio, Argyll and the Colormunki photo.
I have 2 problems: With i1Studio colours and gradient is fine, but the prints (also in proof) come out too pale...?
With Argyll black is OK, but the dark tones are cut, the curve is very strange!?
this is a profile...
thanks, I'm not using canon paper and ink because of the cost...
But the profiles I got from the ICC service are perfect, just want to match them with Argyll...
Hi,
just got my colormunki photo and started profiling my printer, Canon IP7250.
With the X-Rite software i1Studio the result is OK, with the preferred rendering intent "perceptual" the colours are great, the greyscale is complete, but the dark colours and black are a tiny bit less dark.
Argyll...